Why Writers Should Use Their Own English Citation When Citing Other People's Work

Why Writers Should Use Their Own English Citation When Citing Other People’s Work

In this article, we’ll talk about the reasons why writers should use their own English citation when citing other people’s writing. It will also discuss why the term “code-switching” is outdated, and why standardizing English is a setback to racial and cultural equality. Also, we’ll talk about some common academic writing mistakes. Ultimately, we’ll come to the conclusion that the most important thing to remember when citing other people’s work is to use their own English.

Why writers should use their own english citation

One of the most common questions that authors face is how to properly cite their sources. One way to ensure that your citation is appropriate is to make sure you write your sources in your own language. When you use a conversational source, it is helpful to paraphrase or quote it. An essay written by Vershawn Ashanti Young, for example, begins by paraphrasing Stanley Fish and then quotes him.

Young writes that “standard academic English can be detrimental to the artistic process, especially for racial minorities” in her essay. This essay, published in the Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies, takes a critical look at how language can be used for prejudice in the United States. In other words, it is better to use the language of the writer’s culture. Young argues that “black English” is better than white-language English.

Code meshing replaces the term code-switching

Many scholars argue that code switching should be replaced by code meshing, a more inclusive term that blends two languages and incorporates standard English. While code switching may be common among some cultures, it is often racialized and places students of color at a disadvantage. Code meshing addresses these concerns by making code switching more familiar to all writers. This article explores the pros and cons of the new term.

First, code meshing is a more inclusive word that is based on a concept that allows students to bring their own dialect forward and not hold it back. This concept is in line with the ideology that nonstandard dialects are compatible with standard English. Young believes code meshing is inevitable, and actually desirable. In fact, 28 percent of students have concerns about code meshing.

Standardizing English is holding back progress of racial and cultural equality

According to Dr. Faison and Patrick Derilus, standardizing English is holding back progress towards racial and cultural equality. They claim that educational institutions have conditioned young Black students to feel shame in speaking their dialect, which they say is a critical link to their family and community. Standardized English teaching practices also instill the myth that students who master standard form of English are smarter and intelligent. This is a dangerous bias that educational institutions have perpetuated by imposing an inferior standard form of English on young Black students.

Research shows that children from lower-income families hear less English and have a smaller vocabulary than children from higher-income families. This misalignment can create barriers to school learning and result in a persistent achievement gap. This means that it is vital for educators to consider the cultural background and language of children of all races and income levels before implementing policy solutions. The following paragraphs highlight why standardized English education hinders the progress of racial and cultural equality.

Common errors in academic writing

One of the most common mistakes in academic writing is incorrect capitalization of words in titles. It is essential to make sure that titles are properly capitalized – it is not just random practice, but requires extra care when writing for academic purposes. There are general rules for capitalization of titles, but specific style guides may prescribe different standards. Listed below are some common mistakes in titles. Make sure to avoid these common mistakes and use a style guide if you’re unsure.

The control of grammar and syntax helps readers judge the quality of your work. Despite this, grammar and punctuation rules may change depending on the audience and purpose of your writing. Different writing situations require different marking styles. Some instructors may not even mark sentence-level errors as errors, while others may consider them stylistic choices. In a study by Andrea Lunsford and Karen Lunsford, they identified some of the most common errors and their corresponding corrections.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.